Filed under: Computers

According to CNET News, a study appearing today in the Canadian Medical Association Journal claims that computer reminders, which doctors use while electronically charting and writing prescriptions for patients, don’t improve the quality of health care as much as they were once expected to do. In 2008, Medicare even offered incentives for doctors to adopt and use e-prescriptions, but according to this review of 28 clinical trials, digital reminders improved the accuracy and reliability of medicine taking by a median of 4.2-percent. At best, the reminders improved accuracy and quality by a median of 5.6-percent, which the study’s authors characterize as being “below thresholds for clinically significant improvements.” The authors go on to say that these results make e-prescriptions nothing more than “an expensive exercise in trial and error.”
We’re not doctors, but it seems like any improvement is better than none — especially in light of this CNET News report that suggests handwritten prescriptions are seven times more likely to result in an error. The study does note that one institution saw significant improvements with a “homegrown” system, which suggests the key is designing and implementing a regimen that’s easy-to-use and accessible. [From: Canadian Medical Association Journal, via: CNET News]
eReminders Less Effective for Doctors Than Hoped, Study Finds originally appeared on Switched on Tue, 09 Mar 2010 13:35:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.
Read | Permalink | Email this | Comments












North Korea is renowned for many things, including famine, human rights violations, a comically evil leader, and the world’s 



